beta
Text
1. The Defendants stated the “execution Right Board” column in the attached list of executive titles against the Taehan River Industry Co., Ltd.
Reasons
1. Basic facts
A. Between the Plaintiff and Taesung C&D Co., Ltd., the sales contract for the file files was concluded 1) SK Construction Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “SK Construction”).
The Korea Land and Housing Corporation shall supply and demand the construction of FF wastewater terminal treatment facilities from the Korea Land and Housing Corporation, and among them, the Korea Land and Housing Corporation and the Korea Land and Housing Corporation (hereinafter “instant
2) The Tae River Industry Co., Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as the “Tai River Industry”)
(2) On December 7, 2012, the solar steel industry concluded a sales contract (hereinafter “instant sales contract”) with the Plaintiff to purchase 400 x 150 x 13 x 13 x 22 x 364 x 480.48 x 549,669,120 won (including value-added tax) on the ground that the soil has broken down or leaked, and the Plaintiff changed the quantity of the trial file from December 7, 2012 to December 11, 2012 to the place designated by the buyer of the instant construction site (hereinafter “the instant sales contract”). Accordingly, the Plaintiff, from December 7, 2012 to December 12, 2012, entered into the sale contract with the seller of the instant goods at the place designated by the buyer of the instant construction site (hereinafter “the delivery site”).
3) Meanwhile, on July 4, 2012, the solar steel industry entered into a basic transaction agreement with the Plaintiff for the purpose of concluding a basic contract on the supply of goods. The main contents are as follows. Article 1(1) of the basic transaction agreement provides goods to the solar steel industry, and the Plaintiff purchases the solar steel industry.
Article 2 (Basic Contract) This Agreement shall apply to all arrangements entered into between the Pacific Industries and the Plaintiff with respect to the supply of goods for the duration of the contract provided for in Article 3.
Provided, That if an individual agreement on the supply of goods is different from the contents of this contract, the purpose and purpose of this contract shall be prejudiced.