1. The Incheon District Court Branch Decision 2016Gaso8493 decided to execute the decision of performance recommendation against Defendant B Co., Ltd.

1. Basic facts

A. The Plaintiff is a person engaged in gold-type manufacturing business with the trade name D from December 26, 2012, and C (hereinafter referred to as the “sub-committee”) is a corporation established on January 9, 2015 for the purpose of gold-type design and manufacturing business.

B. On July 20, 2016, based on the executory exemplification of the decision of performance recommendation rendered by the Incheon District Court Branch Branch 2016Gaso8493, Defendant B attached each of the items listed in the attached Table 1 attached hereto (No. 1 through No. 17, each of the items listed in the attached Table 1 attached hereto, are the same as No. 1 through No. 17, among the items listed in the attached Table 3 attached hereto, and attached Table 1 through No. 17, hereinafter “attached Table 3”).

C. Defendant Young-gu Co., Ltd.: (a) based on the executory exemplification of the decision on performance recommendation (No. 2015Gau37517) rendered by the Incheon District Court Branch for the Nonparty Company, attached articles 1 through 17 as indicated in the Attachment List No. 3, July 8, 2016.

Defendant Hanyang District Court Decision 2015Da1623 decided March 15, 2017, which attached each of the items listed in the attachment list attached Form 3, based on the executory exemplification of the payment order, which was finally attached to the non-party company.

[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap evidence 1 through 6, 10, 9-3 and 4, and the purport of the whole pleadings

2. Determination on the cause of the claim

A. Among the articles attached to the Plaintiff’s assertion, the articles listed in the attachment list Nos. 1, 6, 8 through 10, and 14 through 17 and the articles listed in the attachment list Nos. 1, 6, 8 through 10, and 14 through 21 among the articles attached to the Defendant Hanyang-si Co., Ltd., Ltd., and the articles attached to the Defendant Hanyang-si Co., Ltd., are those owned by the Plaintiff. Therefore, the Defendants’ compulsory execution against them is unlawful

B. Reviewing the reasoning of the judgment 1, as follows: ① the goods listed in [Attachment 3] Nos. 15 and 16 on December 20, 2012, ② the goods listed in Attachment 3 List Nos. 14 and 17 on December 26, 2012, ③ the respective goods listed in Attachment 3 List Nos. 14 and 17 on December 26, 2012, and ③ the attached Table 3.