The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. In light of the gist of the grounds for appeal by the defendant and his defense counsel (e.g., indubly unfair) that the defendant reflects the wrongness of the defendant, the mobile phone purchased by the defendant is about 19, and some of them were returned to the victims, and the defendant committed each of the crimes of this case in order to prepare living expenses in an economically difficult situation, it is unfair that the court below’s sentence that sentenced six months imprisonment is too unreasonable

2. The judgment of the court below was rendered at the Sungwon District Court Branch Branch on January 8, 2014, with two years of suspended sentence for fraud, and the judgment became final and conclusive on the 16th of the same month, and committed the instant crime during the suspended execution period, and even during the suspended execution period, the Defendant did not properly recover from damage up to the trial. In light of the motive and background of each of the instant crimes, the circumstances before and after the instant crimes, the degree of damage, and other various matters stipulated in Article 51 of the Criminal Act, which are the conditions for sentencing, such as the Defendant’s character and behavior and environment as shown in the records and arguments, the court below’s sentence cannot be deemed to be unfair even if considering all the circumstances alleged in the grounds for appeal. Thus, the above assertion is without merit

3. The defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the ground that there is no ground for appeal for conclusion. It is so decided as per Disposition