A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

1. Around 08:05 on September 12, 2015, the Defendant: (a) was called up on the street in front of the “C cafeteria” around Busan Dongdong-gu, Busan; and (b) was reported by the Defendant on the ground that the Victim E, a policeman affiliated with the DD branch of the Busan Police Station, was broken down the Defendant who was divingd in the taxi while under the influence of alcohol at the time, and was under the supervision of F, etc., a taxi engineer at the time, “I see, e.g., e., e., g., g., g., drinking.”

The victim publicly insultingd the victim by referring to “”, etc.

2. The Defendant interfered with the performance of official duties, on the ground that the Defendant: (a) took care of the Defendant, as described in paragraph 1, while carrying out a bath to the above E on the ground that the Defendant, as described in paragraph 1, took care of the background of the instant case, G and patrolmen belonging to the D District of the Police Station, Kim at the time, and at the place specified in paragraph 1; (b) took the back door of the taxi.

E’s grandchildren, E’s police uniforms are cut off by cutting off and additionally falling off, and the above G, which continued to refrain from this, “n't see,” and assaulted on the part of G one time by assaulting that “n't see,” a part of G’s worship, and interfered with police officers’ legitimate performance of duties concerning criminal investigations.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement of the police statement related to F, E, and G;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes of written complaint of E;

1. Articles 136(1) and 311 of the Criminal Act (the point of obstructing the performance of official duties) and the choice of imprisonment with prison labor for the crime concerned;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. The reason for sentencing under Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act of the suspended sentence [the scope of the recommended sentence] The reason for sentencing under Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act is the crime of insult in the judgment that there is no sentencing guidelines that there is no person subject to any special sentencing [6 months to 1 year and 4 months] in the basic area (no person subject to any special sentencing], and thus, only the minimum limit of the recommended sentence for the crime of obstructing the performance of official duties as indicated in the judgment of the basic criminal should be considered (the decision of sentencing]. The following circumstances and the defendant's age, sex, family relationship, family environment;