Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 3,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

On April 4, 2015, the Defendant entered into a lease agreement with the 1843 square meters of a building with the land owned by the 1843 square meters (six units of a warehouse) via a registered mail at the police station located in the Dong-ro, Eup, Myeon-dong, Myeon-dong, Chungcheongnam-do, the Defendant (C) around April 4, 2015, and paid a KRW 382 square meters of a rent, but the Defendant (C) is a D agent even if the said agent is not related to the Do-dong, and the Defendant embezzled the rental fee with the signature and seal affixed on the agent column and embezzled the rental fee amount.

At the time of the contract, the Defendant Nonparty filed a complaint to the effect that: (a) the lessor: (b) he borrowed the name only; and (c) he borrowed six warehouses to cultivate mushrooms; (b) he leased the said six warehouses to the Defendant’s tenant; and (c) as if he was authorized to lease, C had no right to lease the said warehouse, he/she acquired the rent of KRW 4 million by leasing the said warehouse; and (d) on April 27, 2016, the Defendant stated to the effect that, at the police station investigation and intelligence team office, D was subject to a supplementary investigation by the complainant, and “D was paid the rent of KRW 4 million on the pretext of rent, by a non-agent as a representative.”

However, in fact, six units of the above warehouse were transferred to D on the registry, but around December 2013, D and C agreed that the above six units of warehouse were owned by C through an agreement. On March 23, 2015, the Defendant entered into a lease agreement with the said six units of warehouse units in the office of the “E-Official Broker” office on March 23, 2015, and confirmed that C and C had the right to lease as the actual owner through telephone conversations with D through a certified broker and confirmed that C had the right to lease with D through telephone conversations with D through a certified broker, and even if C was the owner of the above six units of warehouse, the conflict was caused by the reason that C used the above warehouse and used the underground water was not the real estate owner.