The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The decision of the court below on the gist of the reasons for appeal (two years of imprisonment) is too unreasonable.

2. Although the judgment of the court below is recognized that the defendant led to the confession of the crime and reflects the depth of the defendant, there is no record of punishment in the Republic of Korea, and the police officer who investigated the defendant wants to leave the defendant's seat, the court below also seems to have determined the punishment in consideration of all the above sentencing factors.

In this situation, the crime of this case is committed by the Defendant beyond the purchase, medication, and possession of, and distributed through the sale or delivery of, the Defendant. In light of the contents and methods of the crime, the nature of the crime is extremely poor and very heavy, in view of the contents and methods of the crime, etc., the crime related to narcotics is committed not only by the body and mind of an individual, but also by causing serious adverse effects on society, such as impairing the public health and causing other crimes. Therefore, it is necessary to punish the crime of this case. The Defendant was detained due to the crime of this case, and the Defendant was subject to disciplinary punishment in violation of the discipline, and other various sentencing conditions indicated in the argument of this case, such as the Defendant’s age, career, character and behavior, environment, motive, means and consequence of the crime, etc., the punishment of the lower court is too unreasonable.

Therefore, the defendant's above assertion is without merit.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act since it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.