1. The Defendant’s payment order against the Plaintiff was issued on May 4, 2012 by the Busan District Court Branch of the Incheon District Court, the Kimpo-si Court, Kimpo-si, 2012.

1. Basic facts

A. The defendant is small Ilisher, and C is the plaintiff's money.

B. On March 17, 1990, D, the Defendant, as the Defendant, died on March 17, 1990, drafted a letter of agreement on the division of inherited property (hereinafter “the letter of agreement on the division of inherited property”). Around 1999, D, the heir of D, with the content that “the Plaintiff, among inherited property, inherited property, inherited property, shall each inherit KRW 100,00,00,00, respectively, to the effect that “the Plaintiff, among inherited property, inherited property, shall succeed to the entire real property, Defendant C, E, F, G, H, I, I, and J.”

C. The Defendant asserted as follows, against the Plaintiff, filed an application for payment order with the Busan District Court Decision 2012 tea716, Seocheon-si, Kimpo-si, Kimpo-si, and the above court accepted the Defendant’s application on May 4, 2012, and issued the payment order under Paragraph (1) of the Disposition (hereinafter “instant payment order”).

1. Unlike the language and text of the agreement on the division of inherited property in this case, “Seoul-si, K, and 410 square meters (hereinafter “the instant land”) out of the inherited property, was divided into the following parts: (a) the Defendant agreed to entrust the registration title of the instant land to the Plaintiff; (b) so, the agreement on the division of inherited property in this case entered the Plaintiff into the agreement on the division of inherited property into the inheritance of the entire real property

However, the plaintiff did not comply with the above request even though the defendant cancelled the title trust agreement and requested the procedure for the registration of ownership transfer concerning the above real estate. The plaintiff is liable to compensate the defendant for the expenses of 30,000,000 won invested by the defendant in order to construct a new factory on the ground of the above real estate due to the nonperformance of obligation.

2. The Defendant, subject to the condition that “(i) faithfully perform the obligations under the name of the title trustee, such as the entry in paragraph (1), and ② the Plaintiff franchising money,” donated to the Plaintiff the “building on the ground of the Gimpo L (hereinafter “the instant building”) which the Defendant constructed and acquired at the time,” and registered the preservation of ownership thereof.