The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal was around 17:07 on July 2, 2013, the Defendant: (a) went at a speed of 30 to 40km high speed on the side of the galloping-Eup adjacent to Pyeongtaek-si; (b) went to the instant intersection; (c) sent yellow signal at the second direction signal, etc.; and (d) at the time the said signal was nearly finished through the intersection, the Defendant sent a yellow signal to the left and red signal; and (c) accordingly, the Defendant did not violate the signal at the time.

2. The court below found, based on the evidence in its holding, the following facts: ① C, a traffic police officer, was consistently stated as follows: (a) while regulating traffic signal violations along with D and E, the Defendant was able to take a right-hand turn at a speed of 30 through 40 km; and (b) the road in this case is a road where there is an empty signal violation due to the nature of the complete decline, and civil petitions filed by D and other enforcement officers, which took place, and 4-5 drivers had been regulated by signal violations on the same day; (c) the Defendant alleged that he was driving at a speed of 20 to 30 km above the speed of speed at the time; and (d) the Defendant’s assertion that it was difficult to enter the road in this case at a speed of 60 km above the speed of 30 to 40 km; and (e) the Defendant’s assertion that it was difficult to enter the road in this case at the speed of 60 km prior to the passage.