logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 전주지방법원 군산지원 2013.05.29 2013고단291
사기미수
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 6,000,000.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 50,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On October 201, 201, the Defendant: (a) obtained a proposal from Hansan B, Da, E, and F, to put a card in a gambling box; (b) obtained the card, and agreed to do so in a gambling box, i.e., raising a distance of simple food; and (c) conspired with B, with the Defendant, to engage in hump gambling at the Hc shop located in Hasan-si G around November 21, 201, with the proposal that “C loses money from the gambling board, thereby making it difficult for hump gambling; and (d) obtained the proposal that “Ne h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h

At around 00:00 on November 7, 201, the Defendant: (a) received a wood card sent by the said C from the 106-dong 1004-dong 1004, and (b) kept it on the table of the above apartment ward so that the victim D, E, F, etc. can do so for gambling; and (c) C participated in a special siren with which the above wood card can be identified in snow, and participated in gambling, and then acquired money from the victims by using the c, B, and the Defendant’s money. However, the Defendant c, B, and the Defendant d scambling with the fact that the victim C, B, and the Defendant intended to gambling as above, and d scambling by using another card.

As a result, the defendant conspired with C and B to commit fraud, but the victim D did not go through the wind to change the card, but failed to do so.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Each prosecutor's interrogation protocol concerning B and C;

1. Application of a copy of judgment, details of currency, and Acts and subordinate statutes governing the place of public invitation;

1. Relevant provisions of the Criminal Act and Articles 352, 347 (1) and 30 of the Criminal Act concerning the choice of criminal facts;

1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. The Defendant, on the grounds of sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act, is the Jeonju District Court on August 11, 2010.

arrow