1. The plaintiff's claims against the defendants are all dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

1. Facts of recognition;

A. Defendant B is the Plaintiff’s type E (the Plaintiff’s type E, who died on April 20, 202) and Defendant C and D are the Plaintiff’s group E (E).

B. Since July 8, 2002, Defendant B owned 3/7 shares, Defendant C and D owned 2/7 shares, respectively, and the Plaintiff owned 4/9 shares and the Defendants owned 1/9 shares, respectively, with respect to the real estate listed in the attached Table 3 (hereinafter “three buildings”) after January 22, 2010.

C. On the other hand, "one building" is referred to as "one building" in attached Table 1.

(D) The Plaintiff acquired the qualification for a fire safety controller on December 6, 1989, as the fire safety controller and the representative F was appointed on February 6, 2015 and reported on February 9, 2015 by the Plaintiff itself as the Plaintiff’s representative with respect to three buildings on which the Plaintiff was appointed on February 9, 2015 (based on recognition), and on the same day, the ownership transfer registration was made in the G future on December 26, 2014. D. The Plaintiff acquired the qualification for a fire safety controller on December 6, 1989. The Plaintiff was reported on the dismissal on February 6, 2015, and the Plaintiff was appointed on February 9, 2015 by himself/herself as the Plaintiff’s representative with respect to the three buildings. [The grounds for recognition] There is no dispute over the facts, Gap’s subparagraphs 1, 2, 4, and 3 (including the serial number; hereinafter the same shall apply).

each entry, the purport of the whole pleading

2. The plaintiff's assertion and judgment

A. The alleged E and F appointed the Plaintiff as fire safety controller of the building on December 1, 1989 and the two buildings on December 1, 1989.

After the death of E, the appointment relationship between the Plaintiff and the Defendants continues, and the Defendants dismissed the Plaintiff on February 8, 2015.

On February 9, 2015, co-owners of 3 buildings appointed the plaintiff as fire safety controller of 3 buildings.

The Defendants did not pay remuneration to the Plaintiff after February 9, 2015, when the Plaintiff served as fire safety controller of two buildings from April 6, 2008 to February 5, 2015, and thereafter, did not pay remuneration to the Plaintiff as a fire safety controller of three buildings after February 9, 2015, and accordingly, paid the amount equivalent to the minimum wage for two buildings.