beta
Text
1. Defendant A shall deliver to the Seoul Housing and Urban Corporation the buildings listed in the attached list.
2. Defendant.
Reasons
1. Facts of recognition;
A. On December 3, 2015, the Defendants concluded a lease agreement with respect to the buildings listed in the separate sheet (hereinafter “instant building”) with the terms of KRW 11,200,000, monthly rent of KRW 143,400, and the term of lease from December 1, 2015 to November 30, 2017, with the terms of lease leased by Defendant A.
(hereinafter “instant lease agreement”). B.
On August 16, 2016, Defendant A entered into a credit transaction agreement with the Plaintiff on August 16, 2016 with a maturity of KRW 10,00,000, and received the above money at the rate of KRW 9% per annum, and on such security, Defendant A transferred KRW 11,20,000 to the Plaintiff the lease deposit claim for the instant building against Defendant Seoul Housing Corporation, and notified Defendant A of the said assignment of the said claim on the same day.
When Defendant A fails to pay the principal and interest of the building by the due date (the due date for loss of the due date) to the Plaintiff, Defendant A issued a letter of commitment to deliver the building of this case to the lessor immediately so that the Plaintiff can recover the deposit.
C. Defendant A was to the Plaintiff after August 16, 2016.
The interest of the subsection was not paid, and the interest was lost by Article 7 of the General Terms and Conditions of Credit Transactions.
【Ground for Recognition: Facts without dispute, Gap evidence Nos. 1 through 7, Eul evidence No. 1, the purport of the whole pleadings】
2. According to the above facts of determination as to the cause of the claim, the instant lease agreement was terminated on November 30, 2017 at the expiration of the lease term, and upon the Plaintiff’s exercise of the Plaintiff’s subrogation right to claim the refund of the lease deposit, the Defendant A is obligated to deliver the instant building to the Defendant Seoul Housing Corporation. The Defendant Seoul Housing Corporation, along with the delivery of the said building from the Defendant A to the Plaintiff at the same time, was based on the instant lease agreement from KRW 11.2 million to the date of delivery of the said building.