1. The Defendant’s compulsory execution against the Plaintiff is based on the Ulsan District Court Decision 2017Kao1034 decided on the amount of litigation costs.

According to the evidence submitted by the Plaintiff, with respect to this case where the Plaintiff and the Defendant filed an application for the determination of the amount of litigation costs 2017Kada10034 with respect to this case between the Plaintiff and the Defendant, the said court rendered a decision on the determination of the amount of litigation costs that the Plaintiff would have to reimburse to the Defendant, which became final and conclusive, the facts that the above amount of litigation costs was 2,108,110, and the Plaintiff deposited KRW 2,108,110 on March 8, 2017 with this Court Decision No. 1267 on March 8, 2017. Accordingly, according to the above facts of recognition, the Defendant’s claim following the determination of the amount of litigation costs as to the Plaintiff’s above payment deposit is extinguished

The Defendant alleged to the effect that the execution of the seizure of corporeal movables on the Defendant’s property owned by the Plaintiff was lawful, since the Defendant was not notified of such deposit from the Plaintiff. However, the circumstance alleged by the Defendant does not hinder the enforcement of the above decision.

The defendant's assertion is not accepted.

Thus, the plaintiff's claim of this case is accepted on the ground of the reasons.