logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 2016.09.01 2016고단3629
사기등
Text

A person shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for 8 months and by 10 months for each crime listed in the judgment of the accused.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On October 5, 2012, the Defendant was sentenced to one year to imprisonment with prison labor for a violation of the Act on the Control of Narcotics, Etc. in the Incheon District Court’s Branch Branch, and completed the enforcement of the sentence on August 12, 2013. On July 15, 2015, the Incheon District Court sentenced one year and two months to imprisonment with prison labor for a violation of the Act on the Control of Narcotics, etc. (competence) in the Incheon District Court’s Branch, and completed the enforcement of the sentence on March 21, 2016.

1. Crimes related to licensing;

A. Even if the Defendant did not divulge the money under the pretext that he/she would keep the victim’s deposits in a safe place without any leakage of the victim’s financial information, and even if he/she did not intend to return it again, he/she had the victim misrepresented the employee of the Seoul District Prosecutors’ Office by telephone, and had the victim immediately transfer the money to a pre-determined account as if the victim’s financial information was leaked, the Defendant conspired to supply the account to be used for scam and withdraw the remitted amount in cash under the direction of the victim.

On September 25, 2014, the Defendant conspired with the person who was unable to receive the name, and misrepresented to be the employee of the Seoul District Prosecutors’ Office by phone call to the victim C (the age of 23) on September 14, 2014, and, while investigating the financial fraud case, the head of passbook opened in the name of AC was used for the loan fraud crime and was leaked, so the money deposited in the head of the passbook is likely to have been withdrawn. If the Defendant made money deposited in the account of AC, then he would make the money returned again after the end of the case, and the Defendant would have the said victim wired the money to the Agricultural Cooperative (Account Number E) account in the name of D, and received the order from the victim by means of sending KRW 6,020,000 out of the said amount to the person who was unable to receive the order from the person who was unable to receive the name.

arrow