A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

Punishment of the crime

On January 28, 2014, the Defendant was sentenced to one year and six months for the violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes by the Seoul Northern District Court on January 28, 2014, and on June 14, 2015, the Defendant completed the execution of the sentence in the ignsung Vocation

On October 19, 2015, around 18:26, the Defendant stolen the cash amounting to KRW 500,000,000 owned by the victim from the hand room where the victim covered the vinyl between the fruit box and the fruit box using the gap in the location of the victim at Jeju-si D market.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. E statements;

1. Each report on investigation;

1. Each photograph;

1. Previous records: Criminal records, results of search of prisoners, and application of Acts and subordinate statutes of a court ruling;

1. Article 329 of the Criminal Act applicable to the crimes, the choice of punishment, and the choice of imprisonment;

1. Reasons for sentencing Article 35 of the Criminal Act among repeated offenders;

1. Scope of the recommended sentences according to the sentencing criteria;

(a) Determination of types: Two types of larceny for general property;

(b) A person who is under sheshed: A person who is under shed: A repeated crime of the same kind that does not fall under the special category;

(c) The scope of recommendations and recommendations: Reduction field, imprisonment of four months to ten months;

2. Determination of sentence: Imprisonment with prison labor for six months, the fact that the defendant fully pays damages and agreed with the victim, and that the fact of the crime is recognized and that the mistake is against the victim, etc. shall be considered.

However, the Defendant was sentenced to a suspended sentence one time from 2005 to 2007 and sentenced to a fine two times, and was sentenced to a punishment for August in 2007, and even after the execution of the punishment was completed, the Defendant repeatedly committed the larceny during the repeated period from 2008 to 2014 (the Defendant used several methods such as avoiding the snow of the main offender as in the instant case, reducing the amount of goods or cash, or holding the goods of the main agent).