logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2018.06.14 2017고단3203
공갈등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

(e).

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

(2) The Defendant: (a) was a national representative player from around 1980 to around 1987; (b) was a representative player from around 1988 to around 1990 to a representative leader of the State of C youth; (c) from around 1990 to around 1994, D Association director from around 1994 to around 1998 to the representative director of the D Association; and (d) was a representative supervisor of the D Association from around 1999 to around 2012 from around 2005 to around 2012; and (c) was called “the president of the C community”; and (d) was called as “the representative leader of the C community”; and (e) was engaged in the exercise of employment supervision, such as the selection of a national team or vocational team; and (e) was called as “the representative director of the C group” and was called as “the representative director of the C group; and (e) was engaged in the exercise of employment supervision, etc.

Defendant 1, as seen above, intended to attract outstanding players to a vocational team supervisor or high school supervisor (in the event that a representative of the C State players enters or moved into a vocational team, he would have paid the relevant players a subsidy for attracting outstanding players, a single name “scarf expense” to the relevant players) on the basis of the relationship in which he/she accounts for the C’s position and exercises influence, he/she could not refuse such a request, and he/she could not refuse a request from a vocational team supervisor, a senior manager, a high school supervisor, etc. which has a significant impact on the players’ real ability or performance, and the number of players or parents of the players could not refuse such request.

On December 2, 2011, the Defendant: (a) had the Victim G, the parent of F, the national representative player, enter the I Corporation; (b) had F enter the I Corporation; and (c) had F enter the I Corporation C Team; and (d) by telephone, the C Team supervisor of the said C Team.

F instructed F to F to F that it would bring the Switzerlandn Doz. D.

Accordingly, the above J on December 2011.

arrow