logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 평택지원 2015.09.17 2015고단877
마약류관리에관한법률위반(향정)
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not more than ten months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is not a person handling narcotics.

1. On October 17, 2014, the Defendant: (a) purchased KRW 500,000 on the side at the entrance side of the shot bombs, which is located in the balth of the upper balth of the balth of the balth of the balthrototh, and purchased approximately 0.5 g of clophones contained in the single-use injection machine; (b) around 19:00 on March 3, 2015, the Defendant purchased KRW 50,00 on the side at the side at the entrance side of the balth of the male balth of the balth of the balth of the balth of the balth of the balth of the balth of

2. On August 21, 2014, at around 21:00, the Defendant administered approximately 0.2 gramoponon in cans and coffees, melting approximately 0.2 gramopons from E in the event near the door of D school located in Pyeongtaek-si. On March 2015, the Defendant injected approximately 0.1g of phiopons purchased from B in the vicinity of the F apartment complex located in Chungcheong at around 20:00, and injected them into the Defendant’s arms.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Copies of each police statement concerning E and B;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes on narcotics appraisal statement (Ⅰ), requests for appraisal;

1. Article 60 (1) 2, Articles 4 (1), and 2 subparagraph 3 (b) (the point of transaction and administration of phiphonephones) of the Act on the Management of Narcotics, Etc. and Selection of Imprisonment with prison labor for the crime;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act concerning probation or order to attend a lecture;

1. For the reasons for sentencing under the proviso of Article 67 of the Act on the Control of Narcotics, Etc., the scope of final sentence due to the purchase for medication, simple possession, etc. (special mitigation) or the increase in the number of acceptances and acceptances and acceptances and acceptances and the defendant has no same history. From October to 29 [10], the defendant does not have the same history.

arrow