logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울북부지방법원 2015.05.21 2015노132
교통사고처리특례법위반
Text

The prosecutor's appeal is dismissed.

Reasons

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal is unreasonable because the sentence imposed by the court below on the defendant (the community service order of three years and one hundred and twenty hours of probation in one year and six months of imprisonment without prison labor) is too uneasible.

2. Although the Defendant had been already punished by a fine several times for the same or a different type of crime as the instant crime, the instant accident was caused by the Defendant’s negligence in the course of driving a taxi in excess of a limited speed, due to his negligence in front of the night, and the degree of violation of the Defendant’s duty of care is unlimited. The victim D (19 years old) who gets on the crosswalk due to the instant accident conflicts with the taxi and dies, and due to the shock, the victim E who was on the taxi was in need of approximately two weeks of medical treatment. However, the Defendant was unable to receive the written notification from the victim D’s bereaved family members due to agreement with the victim D’s bereaved family members and E. However, the Defendant’s mistake was found to be contrary to their depth, and the circumstances leading up to the occurrence of the instant accident, such as the victim’s age, electric power subject to punishment exceeding the fine, and the circumstances leading up to the Defendant’s death before and after the instant accident, which appear to have been established in the instant crosswalk, and the Defendant’s motive and circumstances leading to the Defendant’s death.

arrow