1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

The purport of the claim and appeal is the purport of the appeal.

1. The reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance cited is as follows, and the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance is the same as that of the judgment of the court of first instance, except for adding the judgment of this court in paragraph (2). Thus, it is acceptable in accordance with the main sentence of Article 420 of the

On the second page of the judgment of the first instance, "a lease agreement" and "2016" shall be added to "in accordance with paragraph 4 of the special agreement (at least two years shall be extended only once after the expiration of the contract, and no rent shall be adjusted)."

On July 5, 2018, the first instance court’s fourth and fourth part below added “afterward the Plaintiff’s delivery of the key to the leased object of this case to the Defendant, thereby completing the delivery of the leased object of this case.”

The last 4th of the judgment of the court of first instance and the 5th of the 8th of the 8th of the 5th of the 5th of the 5th of the 5th of the

On the seventh side of the judgment of the first instance, “from December 16, 2017, which is the day following the delivery date of a copy of the complaint of this case, as requested by the Plaintiff” shall be read as “from July 6, 2018, the day following the day on which the Plaintiff delivered the leased object of this case to the Defendant”.

In the 8th judgment of the first instance, "this date of sentencing" is regarded as "the date of sentencing of the first instance judgment".

There are three pages 8 of the judgment of the court of first instance, "C."

[Plaintiff asserted that the Plaintiff claimed for the payment of damages for delay of the lease deposit from December 16, 2017, and that the Plaintiff performed the obligation to deliver the leased object of this case to the Defendant by leaving the leased object of this case and leaving the key to H around September 2017. However, unless there is no assertion as to the fact that H had the right to deliver the leased object of this case on behalf of the Defendant, the above circumstance alone performed the obligation to deliver the leased object of this case to the Defendant.

or the provision of such performance may not be deemed to have been made and otherwise recognized.