logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대구지방법원 서부지원 2014.06.27 2014고단544
도로교통법위반(음주운전)등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On October 24, 2012, the Defendant was sentenced to a fine of three million won for a violation of the Road Traffic Act (driving) at the Daegu District Court on March 24, 2012, and on February 8, 2013, to a suspended sentence of six months for a violation of the Road Traffic Act (Free Driver's License) at the Seogu District Court's Branch Branch Branch, which was sentenced to two years for a suspended sentence of six months for a violation of the Road Traffic Act (Free Driver's License). The judgment

On April 16, 2014, at around 22:35, the Defendant, without a driver’s license, driven a D Ecoo-car without a driver’s license, at a distance of approximately 50 meters from the distance of approximately 0 meters to the front of the wave coo in the same Dong-dong located in the Daegu Seo-gu Incheon Metropolitan City, Seo-gu. In the influence of alcohol content of about 0.170%.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. A report on detection of a host driver (electronicized document);

1. The circumstantial statement of the driver;

1. A driver's license inquiry;

1. Previous records of judgment: Application of an inquiry inquiry report, such as criminal records, and Acts and subordinate statutes to report an investigation (report attached to data related to criminal records);

1. Article 148-2 (1) 1, Article 44 (1), subparagraph 1 of Article 152, and Article 43 of the Road Traffic Act concerning the facts constituting the crime;

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Concurrent Crimes;

1. Selection of imprisonment with prison labor chosen;

1. The punishment of this case is imposed in light of the fact that the defendant was punished eight times for the same kind of crime under Article 53 and Article 55 (1) 3 of the Criminal Act for discretionary mitigation, the defendant committed the crime of this case without being well aware of the fact that he committed the crime of this case even though he was under the suspension period of execution due to the same kind of crime, and the drinking value is high, but the punishment shall be determined as ordered in consideration of the fact that the confession and reflect is made, there is no record of punishment, the fact that the existing suspended sentence is effective, and

arrow