beta
Text
1. The Defendant’s KRW 10,000,000 as well as annual 5% from March 21, 2014 to November 6, 2014 to the Plaintiff.
Reasons
1. The parties' assertion
A. The Plaintiff asserted that the Plaintiff entered into a business agreement with the Defendant on August 9, 2006 and a sales performance rating agreement on September 1, 2009, respectively, and that if the Plaintiff supplies sun-dried salt, etc. produced by the Defendant to major discount stores, the Defendant would pay 5% of the sales amount to the Plaintiff monthly amount (2.5% each month after September 1, 2009) and 1,000,000 won for activity expenses.
From June 2007 to March 2010, the Plaintiff was engaged in business activities, such as supplying salt produced by the Defendant to GS marina, and thus, the Defendant paid KRW 33,000,000 ( KRW 1,000,000 x 33 months) between the period of 33 months to the Plaintiff. However, the Defendant sought payment of KRW 7,00,000,000 among them, and thus, sought payment of KRW 26,00,000.
B. The business contract of August 9, 2006, which was submitted by the plaintiff to the defendant, was voluntarily prepared by the plaintiff, and since it was written before two years before the defendant company was established, it is irrelevant to the defendant company.
On November 2008, the Plaintiff and the Defendant paid KRW 1,00,000 per month to the Plaintiff on condition that they would make sales more than KRW 1,80,000 per month. The Plaintiff did not make sufficient efforts to operate distribution stores. The Defendant paid KRW 8,80,000,00 in total, including the cost of transportation, including the cost of transportation for 1,80,000,000 in trust and for 7 months. As such, the Defendant did not have any obligation to pay the Plaintiff any more expenses for activities.
2. The business contract (Evidence A) signed on August 9, 2006 on the basis of the judgment of August 9, 2006 is not sufficient to recognize the authenticity of the above document solely on the grounds that the defendant denies its preparation, and there is no other evidence to prove otherwise.
In addition, even if the defendant representative director C prepared the evidence No. 1, it is recognized that the defendant company established around November 2008, which was the defendant company, had taken over the contractual relationship with the plaintiff, with the name of D.