Of the instant lawsuit, the Plaintiff’s conjunctive claim against Defendant B is dismissed.

The plaintiff's defendant B.

1. Basic facts

A. A. A de facto marital relationship with Defendant B around May 2007, the Plaintiff agreed to operate the F’F’s main point located in Kimpo-si, Kimpo-si (hereinafter “instant main point”) by starting business in the name of the Plaintiff and operating it together with the said Defendant. However, the Plaintiff agreed to have the operating profit divided into 50:50.

B. Defendant C and D are children of Defendant B.

[Reasons for Recognition] The entry of Gap evidence No. 1 and the purport of the whole argument

2. The plaintiff's assertion and judgment

A. The plaintiff's assertion 1) The plaintiff's primary assertion against the defendant C and D was 4. The defendant B lent the name of the business of this case to the defendant C and paid credit card sales revenue to the defendant C and D to the defendant C and D 5. The defendant B conspired with the defendant C to install the card terminal under the name of others since it did not participate in the actual business, and then paid the credit card sales revenue to the plaintiff 3 and 5. The defendant B were 159,740,00 won to the new bank under the name of the defendant C until December 14, 2009, 1500 won to the plaintiff 4. The defendant B and 5. The defendant B's claim against the above 4. The defendant B were 5. The defendant B and 5. The defendant B's sales revenue of the above 4. The amount of 132,165,584 won from April 6, 200 to December 28, 2009 to the defendant 205.