1. The Defendants jointly set forth the Plaintiff KRW 30,000,000 and KRW 3,000,000 among them, from January 27, 2004.

1. Determination as to the claim against the defendant B

A. Filing a lawsuit for the interruption of extinctive prescription of a claim based on a final and conclusive judgment in the Seoul Central District Court 2005Gahap69583, indicating the claim

(b) Judgment made by the confession of applicable provisions of Acts (Article 208 (3) 2 and Article 150 (3) and (1) of the Civil Procedure Act);

2. Determination as to the claim against Defendant A

A. In a case where a new suit is filed based on the same subject matter of lawsuit as a final and conclusive judgment in which the judgment in favor of the previous suit was rendered due to special circumstances, such as the interruption of extinctive prescription as to the cause of the claim, the judgment in favor of the previous suit shall not conflict with the final and conclusive judgment in favor of the previous suit. Therefore, the court in the subsequent suit cannot

(1) The plaintiff filed a lawsuit against the defendant A with this court for damages of 20,000,000 won and 3,000,000,000,000 won and 3,000,000,000 won and 20,000,000 won and 20,000 won and 20,000,00 won and 20,000,00 won and 20,000 won and 3,00,00,00 won and 2,00,00 won and 2,00,00 won and 3,00,00,00 won and 2,00,00 won and 2,00 won and 2,00,00 won and 2,00,00 won and 3,00,00 won and 2,00,00 won and 2,05,00 won and 2,005% of each of the above judgment.

B. Defendant A’s assertion