A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

1. Around July 6, 2013: (a) the Defendant was under the influence of alcohol with a blood alcohol content of 0.096% at around 05:11, the Defendant driven Dworksta car at the 4km section of approximately 4 km from the roads front of the parking lot for the Mag-gu Seoul Special Metropolitan City, Sungnam-gu, Sungnam-gu, Seoul Special Metropolitan City, to the roads front of the 110-dong parking lot.

2. On July 6, 2013, the Defendant: (a) carried out a drunk driving as of July 6, 2013; and (b) carried out a disturbance by assaulting a woman-friendly E-house in the said C 111-dong 805; and (c) controlled a drunk driving by a police officer assigned to the police box of the Jungwon Police Station G that was called out after receiving a report, he requested the Defendant to the effect that “I would have made a statement that I would have driven instead of I,” and that “I would have made a statement that I would have driven instead.”

On July 7, 2013, the Defendant: (a) expressed to I by telephone at an insular place, that “I would drive a drunkly; and (b) I would drive a motor vehicle instead of four; (c) I would have to talk with I that I would be able to make a false statement; (d) I would be able to talk with I, and (e) requested E and F to make the same purport by telephone at an insular place around that time.

On September 1, 2013, the Defendant made a statement to the effect that “A person was driven on July 6, 2013,” from the traffic survey division of the Seongbuk-gu Police Station in Sungnam-gu, Sungnam-gu, Sungnam-gu, the other party to the traffic survey division, and on September 4, 2013, the Defendant made a false statement to the effect that “A person was under the influence of alcohol at the time when the Defendant wants to make the Defendant under the influence of alcohol so that he was under the influence of alcohol, and that the Defendant was under the influence of alcohol at the time when he was under the influence of alcohol.” On September 13, 2013, the Defendant made a false statement to the Nonindicted Party of the Seongbuk-gu Police Station in the phone to the effect that “A person was under the influence of alcohol due to the lack of appraisal at the time of appraisal by the Defendant. The Defendant did not drive under the influence of alcohol.”