logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2015.11.12 2015노63
사기
Text

All appeals by the Defendants are dismissed.

Reasons

1. Summary of grounds for appeal;

A. At the request of Defendant B, Defendant A (definite or misunderstanding of legal principles) has been recommended to give official commendation to one of the agencies with the authority to recommend official commendation in the U.S. through the AJ of the International Edics Association of Educations, and Defendant A was only able to award the J of this case. In addition, Defendant B and C did not deceiving victims and defraud money in collusion with Defendant B.

In addition, the J Award awarded by I is a true commendation awarded by legitimate procedures.

Nevertheless, the lower court found Defendant A guilty by misapprehending the facts or by misapprehending the legal doctrine.

B. As to Defendant B and C1’s fraud or misapprehension of legal principles, Defendant B and C did not say that the victims may be favorable to entering a university or college or obtain U.S. permanent residence rights when they received the J listing, nor did they deceiving victims, such as there was no means to instruct L et al. to make such statements.

In addition, all the money received from the victims was used as appropriate expenses, and there was no intention of deception or deception to Defendant B and C.

Nevertheless, the lower court found Defendant B and C guilty of this part of the facts charged, either by misapprehending the facts or by misapprehending the legal doctrine.

B) As to the forgery of private documents and the uttering of a falsified private document, Defendant B and C did not use a forged or forged list of KS listing. Nevertheless, the lower court found Defendant B and C guilty of this part of the facts charged by misapprehending the facts or by misapprehending the legal doctrine. 2) The lower court’s sentence against Defendant B and C (Defendant B’s fine No. 7,00,000,000, and Defendant C’s fine No. 5,000,000) is too unreasonable.

2. Determination

A. The grounds for appeal by Defendant A are jointly processed by two or more persons, who commit a crime.

arrow