1. As to the portion of 1/4 of the real estate listed in the separate sheet:

A. It was concluded on June 25, 2012 between the Defendant and B.

Comprehensively taking account of the respective entries in Gap 1-1-1-3, 2-1, 2-2, 3, and Eul 1-1-5 as to the cause of the claim and the purport of the entire pleadings as to the fact-finding by the Ministry of Land, Infrastructure and Transport of this Court, the plaintiff filed a lawsuit against Eul on May 29, 2012 for the claim of advance payment return as Seoul Central District Court 201 Gohap516230, and the plaintiff paid advance payment of KRW 150 million to Eul on January 30, 2012, and KRW 40 million to Eul on the joint and several surety of Eul, and KRW 60 million on April 2, 2013, the plaintiff claimed that "B shall be returned to the plaintiff on April 2, 2013 as Seoul District Court 250,000,000 won and KRW 40 million on May 31, 2013."

On the other hand, it is recognized that the small property has been bearing the obligation to return the lease deposit against the plaintiff (or KRW 248,948,200) and the obligation to return the lease deposit with respect to the real estate of KRW 182,00,000 (or KRW 4,000,000,000,000 to KRW 888,000,000 for the repayment of the lease deposit with respect to the third lessee E with respect to the first lessee with respect to the second lessee with the second lessee with the second floor of KRW 88,00,000,000 for the repayment of the lease deposit with respect to the first lessee with respect to KRW 5,00,000,000 for KRW 2 to the first lessee with respect to the second lessee with the first floor of KRW 5,000,000.

According to the above facts of recognition, B sells the instant real estate to the Defendant.