logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 평택지원 2018.10.05 2018고단869
특정범죄가중처벌등에관한법률위반(도주치상)등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

[criminal history] On November 15, 2007, the Defendant was issued a summary order of KRW 1.5 million for a crime of violating the Road Traffic Act (driving in Drinking) at the Suwon District Court’s Suwon District Court on November 15, 2007; on November 23, 2009, the Defendant was issued a summary order of KRW 1 million for the same crime; on July 30, 2010, the Defendant was issued a summary order of KRW 6 million for a fine of KRW 5 million for the same crime in the Suwon District Court’s Seowon-gu District Court’s Seosan Branch on March 9, 2012, and was sentenced to a fine of KRW 9.5 million for the same crime.

[Criminal facts]

1. Violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes (Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes) by the Defendant is a person engaged in driving the first car in B.

On February 17, 2018, the Defendant driven the said car with a alcohol content of 0.113% 0.13% of alcohol during blood transfusion, and continued two-lanes of two-lanes between the two-lanes between the two-lanes, namely, the 45 national highways adjacent to the intersection, which are located in Ssung-ri-ri 232-3, in the event of safeness.

In this case, a person engaged in driving service of a motor vehicle has a duty of care to prevent accidents by accurately manipulating the steering system and steering gear.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected to do so and was negligent in driving the vehicle at the same vehicle line as above, and the victim C (the 56-year old) who driven the vehicle at the same vehicle line (the 56-year old) was driven by the victim C (the 56-year old). The lower part of the vehicle was the front part of the first vehicle.

Ultimately, the Defendant, by occupational negligence, sustained an injury to light salt, etc., which requires the victim to receive approximately three weeks of medical treatment, but failed to immediately stop and take measures, such as providing relief to the injured party.

2. The Defendant violates the Road Traffic Act (drinking driving) is a trade name fluorous glym, when he was drunkly cultivated at the level of 0.113% alcohol concentration in blood during the day-to-day border, as described in paragraph (1).

arrow