The prosecutor's appeal is dismissed.

1. According to the evidence submitted by the prosecutor, although the court below found the defendant guilty of the facts charged in this case, the court below erred by misapprehending the facts and adversely affecting the conclusion of the judgment, although it could be acknowledged that the defendant had gained property benefits equivalent to 1.23,00 won by threatening the victim.

2. Determination

A. On August 26, 2011, the Defendant: (a) around 21:00, the facts charged: (b) around 21:00, the victim D (the age of 35) was operated by the Busan Shipping Daegu C; (c) the victim “Ejun” means that “Isn't know about how much Isday Is Is Is Is Is Is Is Is Is Is Is Is Is Is Is Is Is Is Is Is Is Is Is Is Is Is Is Is Is Is Is Is Is Is Is Is Is Is Is Is yous Is Is Is Is yous Is yous Is yous Is Is yous Is Is yous Is yous Is yous Is yous Is yous Is yous Is yous Is Is Is yous Is yous Is Is Is Is Is Is Is you will.”

As above, the Defendant, by threatening the victim, had the victim frighten frightly claim a total amount of 1.230,000 won, acquired pecuniary benefits equivalent to the same amount.

B. The judgment of the court below held that the victim was "the defendant was suffering from the counter-influence and was on the seaside in the court of the court below.

By doing so, I would like to finitely finitely finitely finites on the drinking value at all times;

The reason for sending a match without receiving the drinking value from the defendant is that he was a fluent face, and he was a fluent with the defendant.