1. The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Defendant.

Purport of claim and appeal

1..

1. The reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance cited this case is as stated in the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, except for cases where the reasoning of this case is written or added as stated in paragraph (2). Thus, this is cited in accordance with Article 8(2) of the Administrative Litigation Act and the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act

2. Each “this Court” portion of the 7th 9 line used or added, 9th 8th , 10 bottom, 11th 1st gate is called “court of the first instance”.

At the bottom of 7, the part “other than piracy directors” is referred to as “other than piracy.”

9. The following shall be added to the 6th line:

As a result of the fact-finding on the head of the Hanyang University Hospital in this Court - The occurrence of the No. 15 years cannot be excluded from the largest cause for the inappropriate wearing, genetic factors, and other factors. The medical record appraisal report of the first instance court did not show the Plaintiff’s non-fluoric family ability and did not confirm the family ability. - If the degree of the Plaintiff’s walking disability caused by the previous type of disease is serious, it is highly likely that the non-fluoric family ability aggravated. - The nature of the non-fluoric family disease, which is the fluoric-fluoric personality of the fluoric-fluorics, was accumulated for a period of 15 years. The Plaintiff’s fluoric family history contributed to the occurrence of the disease of this case. - the size of the Plaintiff’s birth, the size of the cross-fluoricization, the material and solid materials of the police fluoric-fluoricization, etc., which appears to be the ground for further inquiry of the Plaintiff 1710.