1. The defendant's KRW 48,148,613, and KRW 1,120,000 to the plaintiff Eul, and KRW 1,00,00,00 to the plaintiff C, D, and E respectively.

Basic Facts

On April 30, 2014, the driver G of the vehicle(F) in the East Sea brought to the west market by neglecting the duty of the ebbrence at the intersection where the yellow on-and-off signal is installed, while driving along the four-lane road in front of the ebrence distance from the center of the Tong Young-si to the center of the central market along one-lane in the direction of the Tong Red Cross Hospital.

As a result, the plaintiff A, who was getting on the H Hedominian delivery error in the opposite one lane, was immediately avoideded by the harming vehicle, and was returned to the road, and was sent to the emergency vehicle immediately after being loaded on the road.

Plaintiff

A was subject to a disability diagnosis, such as an open space of two pys, a combination of two ducts (du Government), an infectious disease of two ducts, and an external ductal one with no open one.

(hereinafter “instant accident”). Plaintiff A is the victim of the instant accident. Plaintiff B, C is the parent, Plaintiff D, and sibling, and Defendant is the insurer of the instant accident.

[Ground of recognition] without any dispute, Gap 1, 2, 3, 9, 10 evidence, and the whole purport of the pleading as a whole, due to negligence on the left-hand left-hand turn without neglecting the duty of care at the point of non-protection left-hand left-hand turn, the defendant A, who was on the part of the defendant A, on the part of the defendant A, who was on the part of the defendant A, on the part of the opposite part, has suffered a big injury such as overcoming the direction to escape the collision with the marine vehicle, and cutting down two dunes. Such G's act constitutes a tort.

Therefore, the defendant, who is the insurer of the household vehicle, is liable to compensate the plaintiff for the damage caused by the accident in this case.

However, the limitation of liability is limited, since the damage was increased due to the failure of the Plaintiff A to wear a fitness at the time of the instant accident, such mistake of the Plaintiff A shall be considered in determining the amount of damage that the Defendant is liable for, but the Defendant shall be considered in light of the aforementioned facts and all the circumstances