Defendant shall be punished by a fine of 1.5 million won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, the amount of KRW 100,000 shall be paid.

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is a person who lacks the ability to discern things or make decisions due to the fact that he/she has made compilations.

1. On August 27, 2017, around 19:20, the Defendant: (a) opened a string line between the wing wing wing wing vehicle operated by himself on the front side of Gwangju-dong, Gwangju-gu and carried out at the above location; (b) was the victim E ( South and 26 years old); and (c) was able to boom the victim’s bridge, and booming the victim’s bridge; and (d) boomed the victim’s bridge, 2:3 times the breath of the bridge while carrying the victim on his own vehicle, and b/3 times the 2/3 breath of the 7-day string, etc., leading the victim to an assault, which requires treatment.

2. The Defendant kept the victim under confinement by continuously carrying the breath of breath, carrying the victim on his own vehicle, carrying about approximately 10 meters of breath, etc. on the victim’s breath.

Summary of Evidence

1. Each legal statement of witness E and witnessF;

1. A medical certificate;

1. Application of the photographic Acts and subordinate statutes;

1. Relevant legal provisions of the Criminal Act, Article 257(1) of the Criminal Act (the point of injury), Article 276(1) of the Criminal Act (the point of confinement), and the choice of each fine for the crime;

1. Articles 10(2) and 55(1)6 of the Criminal Act to mitigate mental and physical weakness [the defendant committed each of the crimes of this case in the state that he/she has a weak ability to discern things or make decisions due to editing illness, etc., comprehensively taking into account the following: the defendant's admission/discharge certificate submitted by his/her defense counsel; the details of health insurance benefits for the last ten years; the course and method of the crime of this case; and the defendant's statement attitude and content in this court];

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. Determination as to the assertion by the Defendant and his/her defense counsel under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act

1. In full view of the following facts and circumstances revealed through a comprehensive review of the evidence duly adopted and examined by this court, it can be recognized that the defendant committed the victim as stated in the facts constituting the crime.