1. Defendant A shall be punished by a fine of 5,00,000 won, and Defendant B shall be punished by a fine of 4,000,000 won.

2. Defendants each of the above facts.

Punishment of the crime

The Defendants, along with the name “D” and “E, engaged in the business of selling false and valuable information on the Internet sites, such as the Nberber Cafa and China, with the intention of receiving money from an unspecified number of unspecified people who have contacted with the Defendants as if they will send the goods to the public.

As a result, the name "D" plays a general role in managing the telecom workplace and sub-members based on Thailand; E was a domestic management measure that instructs the Defendant A, who is the total book of the sub-sponed withdrawal; Defendant A had the book of the sub-soned withdrawal; Defendant A instructed the withdrawal book to deliver the medium of electronic financial transaction access such as the large passbook and the check card to the withdrawal book; Defendant B had the responsibility to withdraw the money and deliver it to Defendant A under the direction of Defendant A.

On December 31, 2016, the name "D," etc., which is a total book, sells 5 galgr gallon 5 in "hym market."

“If the payment is made to the victim F who reported and contacted false material information, the payment is made by false means as if he would send “gallon No. 5”, and it is received KRW 2.80,000 from the victim’s bank account (Account Number:H) with G name, and the Defendant A, who received the order of withdrawal from E, instructed the Defendant B, etc. to withdraw the money, and the Defendant B withdrawn the money from the Defendant’s order of withdrawal and obtained it by fraudulent means.

As a result, the Defendants conspired with one another, "D", and "E," and acquired money from the victim.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. Statement made by the police with regard to F;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes on deposit certificates and Kakao Stockholm dialogue;

1. The Defendants: Articles 347(1) and 347(1) of the Criminal Act; Articles 347(1) and 30 of the Criminal Act; and the choice of fines

1. Defendants: The reasons for sentencing of Articles 70(1) and 69(2) of the Criminal Act are as follows.