A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than one year and six months.

Punishment of the crime

On May 18, 2011, the Defendant was sentenced to imprisonment with prison labor for habitual fraud, etc. in the above court on May 18, 201, and completed the execution of the sentence in the smuggling detention house on October 1, 2012.

1. On December 9, 2012, around 13:10 on December 9, 2012, the Defendant was boarding a D taxi drivinged by the victim C at the front of the gold-free shop located in the valley-dong of Busan Geum-gu.

However, the Defendant did not have any means to pay for taxi expenses and did not have any intention or ability to pay taxi expenses even if he takes a taxi.

Nevertheless, the defendant, by deceiving the victim, arrived in front of the Dong-dong post office located in Busan Dong-dong, but did not pay 4,300 won for taxi, thereby acquiring property benefits equivalent to the above amount.

2. On December 13:30, 2012, the Defendant: (a) boarded the F taxi driven by the victim E on the road located in the Busan East-dong, Busan-dong; and (b) caused the victim to operate the taxi to the front of the gravel storage market located in the Southern-dong, Busan-dong.

However, the defendant did not have any ability or intention to pay the taxi fee.

Accordingly, the defendant did not pay 6,500 won a taxi fee by deceiving the victim, thereby taking property benefits equivalent to the same amount.

3. Around 11:50 on December 12, 2012, the Defendant received food, etc. a total of 33,000 won of the market price, including the 30,000 won of the high-speed 1, the market price of which is equivalent to 30,000 won of the market price, although the Defendant did not have the intent or ability to pay the food value at “I” restaurant where the victim H located in Busan Jung-gu G was an employee.

Accordingly, the defendant was given property by deceiving the victim.

4. On December 24, 2012, the Defendant, “L” operated by the Victim K in Jung-gu, Jung-gu, Busan on December 23:50, 2012, did not have an intention or ability to calculate the drinking value at the drinking house, the Defendant made a false statement to the victim that “if a person commits a clerical error, so that he/she would have caused a clerical error, so that he/she would change the drinking and drinking.”