(영문) 수원지방법원 성남지원 2015.11.12 2015고단2139

beta

본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.

Text

Reasons

텍스트 조절

글꼴

크기(pt)

굵기

줄 간격

자간(%)

(영문) 수원지방법원 성남지원 2015.11.12 2015고단2139

절도

Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On May 19, 2015, the Defendant was sentenced to two years of imprisonment with prison labor for larceny at the Seoul Northern District Court on May 19, 2015, and the decision became final and conclusive on May 27, 2015 and is currently in the grace period.

At around 12:40 on September 28, 2015, the Defendant: (a) cut off one of the gallon 870,000 won in the market value of the said victim’s possession in a place where the victim C puts to put put to put to order and sell put to order; (b) cut off one of the gallon 870,000 won in the market value of the said victim’s possession; and (c) cut off the victim’s bicycle bags at the same time and at the same place in order for the victim D to put to put to order to put, put, or put, at the same time, the victim’s market value of 90,000 won in a opphone 60,000 that is the victim’s market value of the said victim’s possession.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

2. Each police statement concerning C and D;

3. Police seizure records;

4. Previous convictions in judgment: Criminal records, search of related cases, and application of statutes governing judgment.

1. Relevant Article 329 of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting the crime, the choice of imprisonment;

2. The reason for sentencing under the former part of Article 37, Article 38(1)2, and Article 50 of the Criminal Act among concurrent criminals [the scope of recommending punishment] The basic area (6 to 16 months) of the Act on Theft for general property [the decision of sentencing] / [the decision of sentencing] the defendant committed the crime of this case during the suspended execution period for the same kind of larceny, and in particular, the defendant repeats the crimes of the same law, such as stealing possessions of those who are engaged in put to put to place to place to place to place to place to place to place to place to place to place to place to place to place to place to place to a victim

However, the punishment was determined in consideration of the favorable circumstances in which all damaged goods have been returned.

참조조문

유사 판례

-인천지방법원 2015.12.02 2015고합611

-인천지방법원 부천지원 2015.08.28 2015고단1684

-서울중앙지방법원 2016.10.26 2016고단6210

-서울중앙지방법원 2019.10.16 2019고단2889

-인천지방법원 부천지원 2015.10.07 2015고단1655