Text
A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
On May 19, 2015, the Defendant was sentenced to two years of imprisonment with prison labor for larceny at the Seoul Northern District Court on May 19, 2015, and the decision became final and conclusive on May 27, 2015 and is currently in the grace period.
At around 12:40 on September 28, 2015, the Defendant: (a) cut off one of the gallon 870,000 won in the market value of the said victim’s possession in a place where the victim C puts to put put to put to order and sell put to order; (b) cut off one of the gallon 870,000 won in the market value of the said victim’s possession; and (c) cut off the victim’s bicycle bags at the same time and at the same place in order for the victim D to put to put to order to put, put, or put, at the same time, the victim’s market value of 90,000 won in a opphone 60,000 that is the victim’s market value of the said victim’s possession.
Summary of Evidence
1. Defendant's legal statement;
2. Each police statement concerning C and D;
3. Police seizure records;
4. Previous convictions in judgment: Criminal records, search of related cases, and application of statutes governing judgment.
1. Relevant Article 329 of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting the crime, the choice of imprisonment;
2. The reason for sentencing under the former part of Article 37, Article 38(1)2, and Article 50 of the Criminal Act among concurrent criminals [the scope of recommending punishment] The basic area (6 to 16 months) of the Act on Theft for general property [the decision of sentencing] / [the decision of sentencing] the defendant committed the crime of this case during the suspended execution period for the same kind of larceny, and in particular, the defendant repeats the crimes of the same law, such as stealing possessions of those who are engaged in put to put to place to place to place to place to place to place to place to place to place to place to place to place to place to place to place to a victim
However, the punishment was determined in consideration of the favorable circumstances in which all damaged goods have been returned.