logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울동부지방법원 2017.04.24 2017고단222
상습절도
Text

Defendant

A Imprisonment for two years, Defendant B, and C shall be punished by each fine of KRW 1,500,000.

Defendant

B and C, respectively.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

[criminal history] On September 23, 2015, Defendant A was sentenced to one year to imprisonment with prison labor for the purpose of night residence intrusion larceny and night residence intrusion larceny at the Seoul Eastern District Court on September 23, 2015, and completed the execution of the sentence in the astronomical Prison on July 7, 2016.

[Criminal facts]

1. Defendant A prepared, in advance, criminal tools, such as large drackers, pipe mortars, lockers, makes, etc., with the intent to steal money and valuables by cutting down a densely concentrated area of housing in Seoul Metropolitan City, and intrusion into an abandoned house.

Between around 17:00 and around 20:30 on December 4, 2016, the Defendant cut off and intruded with the pipe stringer with which he was in possession of a toilet crime prevention window at the victim G located in F 102 of Gangseo-gu Seoul, Gangseo-gu, Seoul, and went into the inner bank, and cut off and stolen three half of the market value of the victim’s possession, which was in the front line, at least 2,840,000 won. From that time until December 30, 2016, the Defendant attempted to steals up to 63,690,000 won in total, or attempted to steals the victims’ property at a total of 18 times, as indicated in the list of crimes in the attached Form.

Accordingly, the defendant habitually stolen or attempted to steal the victims' property.

2. Defendant C is a person engaged in sales of precious metals with the trade name named “I” in Songpa-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government H.

From around 13:50 on December 6, 2016 to around 14:00, the Defendant purchased three half of the total market value of the victim G ownership that he stolen from A from the above “I”.

In such cases, the defendant, who is engaged in sales of precious metals, has a duty of care to verify whether he/she is stolen by ascertaining the personal information, etc. of A, while taking into account how he/she acquired it, how he/she acquired it, how he/she wants to sell it, and how to demand

Nevertheless, the defendant neglected the above care and neglected the judgment on the stolen property.

arrow