logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 인천지방법원 부천지원 2018.04.16 2016고단3284
사기
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than one year and six months.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

[2016 order 3284]

1. On December 15, 2014, the Defendant would make the victim E at the Seoul Gangnam-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government Office No. 301 D office, and would make the victim E gain profit if he/she participates in the case where he/she has a case of accepting apartment business in the Jongno-gu Seoul Jongnodong.

In order to make an investment of KRW 50 million, it first borrowed KRW 9 million from the acquisition fund. The false statement was made.

However, the defendant did not have any intention or ability to repay the debt even if he borrowed money from the injured party without any specific income, and he had to return 9 million won to F corporation.

The Defendant had the victim transfer KRW 9 million to the NongHyup Bank account designated by the Defendant on the same day, and acquired pecuniary benefits equivalent to the same amount.

2. On December 22, 2014, the Defendant continued to lend money to the same purpose to the same victim, and received money from the victim by receiving 2.5 million won from the victim to the national bank account in the name of Dong G to the national bank account in the name of Dong G.

[2017 Highest 225 [Attachment 205] The Defendant, which was implemented in Korea Land Trust Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “Korea Land Trust”) and sold in H, by proxy, sold unsold apartment units in Gyeonggi-gu I apartment units (hereinafter “instant apartment units”) and decided to collect fees equivalent to KRW 10 million for each apartment unit in return for such apartment units.

The initial land trust in Korea sold the apartment of this case at the price discounted by 20% from the original selling price, but with respect to the remaining 20% of the outstanding apartment, the payment has been postponed between 1 to 2 years. The Defendant had expressed a false statement to invite both parties by selling the apartment of this case at the price discounted by 40% from the original selling price in order to sell the unsold apartment of this case.

On September 2013, the Defendant was the victim J at the point of use of the Incheon Suhyup-ro 29, Jung-gu, Incheon, Jung-gu.

arrow