The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal (unfair sentencing) by the court below (in 6 months) is too unreasonable.

2. The judgment of the court below (1) The accident of this case occurred due to the defendant's negligence without properly verifying the bicycle from the opposite part, and it seems that the defendant did not have a conflict between his bicycle and the victim's bicycle until the trial at the trial at the trial at the trial at the trial (the defendant alleged that there was no conflict between his bicycle and the victim's bicycle, but it cannot be believed as it is because it was different from the witness's statement of the accident of this case, and even if the defendant's assertion was true, it does not change the fact that the victim suffered an injury due to the above negligence by the defendant's above negligence). (2) The accident of this case suffered an injury due to about 8 weeks medical treatment, the victim suffered an injury, such as an injury due to an external wound, which had no open address for 8 weeks medical treatment, and continued to live a normal life due to the post, and (3) the defendant does not have an attitude to separate or reflect his fault from the defendant's wrong to the trial at the trial at the trial at the trial at the court at the court of 0000th.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the defendant's appeal is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.