logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울고등법원 2015.12.01 2014나6604
정산금 등
Text

1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Purport of claim and appeal

The first instance court.

Reasons

1. The reasons for a judgment of the first instance shall be quoted by this judgment pursuant to the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act citing the judgment of the first instance;

(1) Judgment of the first instance court: Provided, That this shall not apply.

A. On March 3, 2011, the part (1) (2 pages 9-15) (2) indicated the Defendant as “Defendant” without distinguishing between the Defendant and the Defendant.

(ii) and doping Co., Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as “doping”);

) On February 16, 2010, the film produced by doping and invested by the Plaintiff (hereinafter “the film”) is “the film of this case.”

(3) In the agreement that the Defendant agreed to distribute, the Defendant agreed to pay the remainder to the account designated by the Plaintiff, including the following: (a) the Defendant first disbursed marketing expenses, such as advertising promotion expenses and distribution expenses incurred in the distribution process; and (b) deducts marketing and marketing planning expenses, distribution charges, and marketing management fees paid by the Defendant from the sales amount of the said film; and (c) deposit the remainder into the account designated by the Plaintiff:

(B) The amendment contract was made on March 11, 2010, but the main contents of which are the same.

(1)"Along with the first instance court's judgment, the first instance court's judgment No. 5-6-7 "liability under this case's contract" has been filed with "the obligation to pay the settlement amount under this case's contract."

In addition, this Court shall add the judgment on the plaintiff's argument as follows.

2. Additional determination

A. The decision on provisional seizure of claims by the U.S. Venture Capital Co., Ltd. (Seoul Central District Court 2011Kadan1734) cannot be deemed to have been served on and after April 12, 2011, which is the due date for the settlement of the expenses for the Plast Capital, and its effect extends to the above settlement claim. The provisional seizure decision on claims by creditors B, Inc. (Seoul Central District Court 2010Kadan79279, 2010Kadan6122) that was served prior to the due date is also the amount of the provisional seizure claim amount.

arrow