logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원안양지원 2020.06.25 2019가합100368
손해배상(기)
Text

1. The Defendants jointly enter the Plaintiffs in the “total” sheet of the cited claim amount in the annexed sheet, and the two.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. 1) The Plaintiffs are the parties to the instant apartment in the militaryposi-si (hereinafter “instant apartment”).

The number of houses for each plaintiff is a resident who owns and resides in the household. The number of houses for each plaintiff is the same as the entry in the column of the claim No. 1 in the annexed sheet. 2) Defendant I and J (hereinafter “Defendant I, etc.”) are the owner who newly constructed a Ntel (hereinafter “Defendant building”) in Ma in militarypo-si adjacent to the north east-dong of the apartment of this case, and Defendant K Co., Ltd (hereinafter “Defendant Co., Ltd”) is a representative director and J as a director for the construction of the above officetel.

B. From the date of the completion of the construction of the Defendant building up to the date of 2017, M is deemed as having the fourth floor size above the above ground-based Ma. (hereinafter “existing building”).

The building was built. Defendant I et al. decided to remove the existing building, construct the Defendant building on the 14th and the 3rd underground floor size, and began to build the Defendant building from January 2018 after obtaining a building permit. 2) The building owner of the Defendant building was replaced by Defendant I et al. around March 2018, and the Defendant building was completed on March 31, 2019.

The distance between the south of the defendant's building and the North east of the apartment of this case is about 1.7 meters on the basis of each outer wall.

3) Both the instant apartment and the Defendant’s building are the National Land Planning and Utilization Act (hereinafter “National Land Planning Act”).

c) Changes in the sunshine time, tent rate, and view infringement rate of the apartment of this case where each of the plaintiffs is living before and after the construction of the new apartment of this case due to the construction of the new apartment of this case are located in the general commercial area stipulated in the above, and the third won numerical model before and after the construction of the new apartment of this case is as follows. The changes in the sunshine time, tent rate, and view infringement rate of each of the apartment of this case where each of the plaintiffs is living before and after the construction of the new apartment of this case shall be as follows. O PP QR S T U (U without any dispute over the grounds for recognition, Gap 1-1 through 5, 8-1 through 16, Eul 1-1 through 7-5, and Eul 7-5.

arrow