1. The plaintiff's claims against the defendants are all dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

1. Facts of recognition;

A. On September 10, 2014, the Plaintiff entered into a contract with Defendant B, who operated the instant headquarters, under the name of Defendant C (hereinafter “D”), under which Defendant B would grant all responsibilities and authority to the Plaintiff with respect to the business, sale, and post management of closed-circuit television (hereinafter “CCTV”) which is the product of the instant headquarters, in the Seoul Games area (hereinafter “the instant sales contract”).

Article 3 (Responsibility and Authority (1)

(d) deduct 5% of the head office fee (based on the amount deposited at the installment) from the installment at the time of the payment of the price;

(2) Total sales

(c) In principle, the total value of the headquarters should be constructed, but may use other products where it is inevitable due to special needs or business disputes of the subscriber.

(3) The total cost of opening the sales market shall be KRW 5 million and the opening facility shall be KRW 15 million, and the head office shall refund the deposit at the time the contract is terminated or terminated.

Article 5 (Period and Termination of Contract) (2) Termination of Contract: The head office may terminate this contract where the head office has caused enormous losses or business difficulties to the head office within the jurisdiction of the entire board, and where a prior warning and corrective measure are recommended, and where the highest measure is not corrected, the head office may terminate this contract.

B. The main contents of the instant sales contract are as follows.

C. At the time of the conclusion of the instant sales contract, the Plaintiff paid KRW 15 million and deposit KRW 5 million as stipulated in the instant sales contract to Defendant B, and commenced its business. D.

In order to reduce the fee, etc. to be paid by the Plaintiff to the head office of this case, the Defendant B raised doubt that the Plaintiff will use the product of another company, other than the instant head office, and prepared a customer list on April 10, 2015 and on April 23, 2015, and sent it to the head office of this case.