A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is the president in the name of E (business registration on July 15, 2013) located in Busan-gun, and is the actual operator F who is punished by the actual operator F. The defendant will be punished by the actual operator. 30 million won.

A separate fine will be paid on behalf of another person.

Upon receipt of a proposal to the effect that “after accepting it,” the E-related lease contract, business operator registration, and oil sales permission was made in the name of the Defendant in preparation for the actual operator to receive an investigation, and on January 11, 2016, a complaint was filed from the gold Tax Office to submit a list of the accounts for separate tax accounts by the purchaser, and the complaint was filed by the Busan Coast Guard’s Police Station.

On April 14, 2016, and April 21, 2016, the Defendant made a false statement to the effect that he/she was present at the investigation station of the Busan Coast Guard and the 1 team office of the economy of the Busan Coast Guard and was under investigation as the actual operator of E, and that he/she would comply with E, and that he/she was under investigation.

Accordingly, the Defendant, even though the actual operator of E was F, was present at the investigative agency as if the Defendant was the actual operator, and made a false statement, thereby allowing the Defendant to escape F who committed a crime corresponding to a fine or heavier punishment.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to accusation, a list of tax invoices, a written confirmation of facts of transactions, etc., a report scheduled to close an investigation, an investigation report (verification of the actual E business owner photograph, and confirmation of the fact of issuing a warrant of detention of the unemployment owner);

1. Article 151 (1) of the Criminal Act applicable to the relevant criminal facts and Article 151 of the choice of punishment;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the stay of execution (The following sentencing shall be taken into consideration in favor of the people in mind):

1. The crime of this case on the ground of sentencing under Article 62-2 of the Social Service Order Criminal Act is an attempt to conceal another person’s crime in a planned manner in return for payment, and the crime is disadvantageous to the nature of the crime.