The defendant shall be innocent.

1. The summary of the facts charged was that the Defendant had an employee A drive B truck on January 28, 2008, and around January 12:07, A violated the restriction on the operation of the road management agency’s vehicle by operating the freight loaded at the 2 axis at the 11.06t and 11.42t on the 3 axis at the old-gu office of the Corporation at Korea, the 26.9km.

2. As to each of the facts charged of this case, the public prosecutor's determination is amended by Act No. 7832 of Dec. 30, 2005 and 208

3. A claim for a summary order was made by applying Article 86 and Article 83(1)2 of the Act on 21. The above summary order was notified and confirmed.

In this regard, the Constitutional Court on July 30, 2009, when an agent, employee or other worker of a corporation commits an act of violating the provisions of Article 83 (1) 2 in Article 86 of the former Road Act in relation to the business of the corporation, the corporation shall also be punished by a fine under the corresponding Article.

Article 47(2) proviso of the Constitutional Court Act provides that “The Constitutional Court 2008 Constitutional Court 17 Constitutional Court 2008 Constitutional Court 2008 Constitutional Court 201 Constitutional Court 201 Constitutional Court 201 Constitutional Court 201 Constitutional Court 201 Constitutional Court 2

Thus, the facts charged of this case constitute a case that does not constitute a crime, and thus, a judgment of innocence is rendered pursuant to the former part of Article 325 of the Criminal Procedure Act.