logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2013.06.20 2011고정6392
의료법위반
Text

Defendant

A A Fine of 3,00,000 won, Defendant B of 1,000,000 won, Defendant C of 700,000 won, and Defendant C of .

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. Although Defendant A was not accredited, from September 201 to June 15, 201, the Defendant established a massage practice center by having six marbling rooms on a scale of approximately 198 square meters in the name of “G” under the name of “G” from September 1, 2010 to June 15, 201, and having seven marbling rooms, such as one bathing room, one bathing room, one escape room, one employees waiting room, and other facilities. Defendant B et al. hires seven unspecified customers who visited the said business, who visited the said business, by having them take 22,00 won at KRW 65,00 per person and take 65,000 for a large number of unspecified customers who visited the said business.

2. From March 2011 to June 15, 201, Defendant B, without obtaining the recognition of a massage, performed massage in the manner of cutting down the body of customers by using fingers and elbows, etc. from the above “G”, and received 50% of the massage price received from customers in return, and performed massage for profit.

3. Defendant C, without being recognized as a Marine, did not obtain the recognition from the Defendant from January 201 to June 15, 201, used the said “G” from around January 201 to around June 15, 201, in a way that the body of customers was selbowd and pressureed by using hand and arms, etc., and 50% of the massage price received from customers for the purpose of profit-making.

4. Defendant D, without obtaining the recognition of a massage, was aware of the body of customers from January 29, 201 to June 15, 201 by using the said “G”, hand and elbow, etc. from around January 29, 201 to around June 15, 201, and was engaged in massage for profit by taking 50% of the massage price received from customers in return.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. Application of each police interrogation protocol to the Defendants, H, I, J, and K

1. Article 87 (1) 2 of the Medical Service Act and Article 33 (2) 1 of the same Act concerning criminal facts and subparagraph A of the option of punishment:

arrow