Of the part of the lower judgment’s conviction, the part of the case against the Defendant and December 25, 2016.

1. Summary of grounds for appeal;

A. The Defendant and the respondent for an attachment order and the respondent for an attachment order and the respondent for an order to observe the Act on the Protection of Children and Juveniles from Sexual Abuse (i.e., purchase of sex), each of the following facts: (a) the Defendant and the respondent for an attachment order and the respondent for an attachment order (hereinafter “Defendant”) have provided money for a sexual intercourse with the juvenile F as stated in each of the facts charged; (b) the said money is not the price for sexual trafficking, but the amount is not the price for sexual assault, but the amount is not the price for sexual assault, but the amount is the amount of money exchanged between the people. (iii) The Defendant taken the body of the victim F with cellular phone as described in this part of the facts charged, but this was taken with the victim’s consent.

C) On December 7, 2016, a violation of the Act on the Protection of Children and Juveniles against Sexual Abuse (competence) and a rape on January 3, 2017, the Defendant committed a sexual intercourse under an agreement with the victim. As such, the Defendant has the intention to rape against the victim.

subsection (b) of this section.

In addition, the Defendant did not exercise the force to make the victim’s resistance significantly difficult at the time of the sexual intercourse with the victim, and thus, there was assault and intimidation in the crime of rape.

It is also difficult to see it.

2) The sentence of the lower court that is unfair in sentencing (three years of imprisonment, and 80 hours of completion of sexual assault treatment programs) is too unreasonable.

B. Prosecutor 1) Fact-misunderstanding (non-guilty part) The victim, if the defendant constantly demands a sexual relationship with him/her and refuses it, talking that the victim's body would spread his/her dynamic image so that he/she would have a sexual relationship with the defendant as stated in each part of the facts charged, and therefore, he/she could not resist the defendant at the time when he/she could not resist mentally and mentally.

must be viewed.

2) The sentence of the lower court’s improper sentencing is too unhued and unreasonable.

2. Determination

A. Defendant 1’s assertion that the facts of the Defendant are erroneous.