Defendant shall be punished by a fine of 12 million won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

Punishment of the crime

[Criminal Power] On September 5, 2017, the Defendant was issued a summary order of KRW 2 million as a crime of violation of the Road Traffic Act in the support of the Daejeon District Court of Daejeon District on September 5, 2017.

【Criminal Facts】

On June 20, 2020, around 01:45, the Defendant driven B K3 cars under the influence of alcohol content of about 0.214% from the 30m section from the public parking lot in the East coal Station located in 967-144, U.S., Sinsan-dong, to the entrance of the above parking lot, to the new width road.

Accordingly, the defendant violated the Road Traffic Act's prohibition of drinking driving or refusing to measure drinking more than twice.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. A report on the actual state of the driver;

1. Notification of the control of drinking driving;

1. Previous convictions indicated in judgment: Criminal records, investigation reports, and application of Acts and subordinate statutes of one summary order;

1. Relevant Articles 148-2 (1) and 44 (1) of the Road Traffic Act and the choice of fines for criminal facts;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. The reason for sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order is that the defendant repeated a crime despite the fact that the defendant had been punished once due to drunk driving, and that the blood alcohol concentration is very high, etc., under the circumstances unfavorable to the defendant, while the defendant recognizes the crime and is against the truth, the defendant does not have any traffic accident, the criminal record of the above drinking driving is a fine, the criminal record of the above drinking driving is a criminal record, and there is no other criminal record, and the fact that the person desires to keep the defendant's wife boomly, taking into account the circumstances favorable to the defendant, and taking into account all other factors of the sentencing specified in the records of this case.