The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal (e.g., a fine of KRW 5,00,00) of the lower court is too unreasonable.

2. The judgment of the defendant's spouse suffers from a disease such as pulmonary beer and beer, and the defendant is in an economically difficult condition. On the other hand, the crime of this case is found to have been discovered while driving a motor vehicle under the influence of 0.128% of blood alcohol concentration and thus the defendant's drinking value is not low. The defendant's summary order of 1.2 million won is issued for the crime of violation of the Road Traffic Act in the Jeonju District Court Support on April 7, 2008. The defendant committed the crime of this case in this case at the same court on May 21, 2009. The revised Road Traffic Act of June 8, 201 provides that the defendant's punishment of the crime of this case including the defendant's motive and behavior at least two times after taking into account the following factors: since the defendant's punishment was issued for the violation of the Road Traffic Act at the same court on the same date, the defendant's previous Road Traffic Act has no reason to punish the defendant's age and behavior.

3. As such, the defendant's appeal is without merit, and it is dismissed under Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act. It is so decided as per Disposition.