logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2016.10.18 2016고단4880
사기등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

"2016 Highest 4880"

1. On February 8, 2015, the opening nameer E-related private documents, the uttering of a falsified document, and the fraud of the Defendant made use of a pen page No. 2 “Olleh Moble” to describe the personal information of E, including the resident registration number, etc. of E, reported to the effect that he/she applied for the past mobile phone number (F and G) without authority, using a pen page No. 2 “Olleh Moble” to use the pen page No. 3 for the purpose of uttering by the Defendant in Jongno-gu Seoul, who works as an employee of the Defendant in Jongno-gu, and written two copies of the application form for mobile phone subscription under the name of E with the signature of the Defendant to the effect that he/she applied for the mobile phone number (F and G). At that time, two copies of the above application form were sent to the Defendant or the Defendant’s mobile phone number No. 466,200,485,2

As a result, the defendant, who is a private document on rights and duties, has forged and falsified two copies of the application form for mobile phone purchase in the name of E, which is a private document, and obtained two mobile phones of 484,000 won from the victim and acquired them.

2. On January 10, 2016, the Defendant said that “If he opens a new mobile phone 6 mobile phone, he would receive 280,000 won of the insurance money relating to the previous mobile phone 6 mobile phone, he would receive 2.87,615 won of the sales proceeds from the previous mobile phone 6 mobile phone 6 mobile phone 737,615, by selling the previous mobile phone 6 mobile phone 6 mobile phone 6 mobile phone in another place.”

However, at the time, the Defendant did not have any intention or ability to pay the mobile phone phone price as promised by the victim because he did so so to pay a large number of mobile phone machine prices and charges that he opened by stealing another person's name.

The defendant.

arrow