logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대전지방법원 천안지원 2015.07.13 2015고단876
여객자동차운수사업법위반
Text

A defendant shall be punished by a fine of 500,000 won.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant is the driver of a small-sized calben vehicle B.

Any person who intends to operate passenger transport business shall prepare a business plan and obtain a license as prescribed by Ordinance of the Ministry of Land, Infrastructure

Nevertheless, the Defendant:

가. 2014. 08. 25. 12:41경 관할행정관청으로부터 여긱자동차 운송사업 면허를 받지 아니하고 천안시 서북구 직산읍 삼은리 앞 노상에서 화물을 소지하지 않은 손님을 탑승케 한 후 같은 구 성거읍 문덕리 하늘채아파트 앞 노상까지 4km의 거리를 운행 한 후 운행요금으로 4,000원을 받아 유상 여객자동차 운수사업을 하고,

B. On October 30, 2014, around 12:35, a person provides passenger transport service for consideration by receiving 4,000 won or more at the operating fee after operating a distance of 4 km up to the upper end of the same Gu directly operated apartment unit, i.e., Sinan-si, Seo-gu, Seocheon-gu, Seocheon-si, Seocheon-si, Seocheon-si (hereinafter referred to as the "Sacheon-si"), after having a customer not possessing freight on the ground, as

C. On March 26, 2015, around 15:00 (a), around 15:00, a passenger transport service was rendered on board a customer who did not possess cargo in front of the Seo-gu office in the Seo-gu Office in the Yancheon-si, and was operated before the Twin-dong “Yandong” in the same city and received 12,000 won at an operating fee.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Each report on commercial transport services;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of each internal investigation report;

1. Selection of a fine, under subparagraph 1 of Article 90 and subparagraph 1 of Article 4 of the Passenger Transport Service Act, based on the relevant criminal facts, comprehensively on the relevant criminal facts;

1. The case is one of the following: (a) the crime of this case is committed immediately after the suspension of indictment is imposed for the same crime as the sentencing of Articles 70(1) and 69(2) of the Criminal Act; (b) however, it is against the law; and (c) the fact that there is no record of the crime except the case

arrow