beta
Text
1. With respect to H 25,342 square meters of forests and fields in Yongsan-gu, Seoyang-gu, Manyang-si, Incheon-si, the annexed map No. 26, 27, 34, 35, 40, 41, 42, and 26.
Reasons
1. Basic facts
A. The change in the equity relationship between H 25,342 square meters of the forest land in Yongsan-gu, Seoyang-gu, Seoyang-si (hereinafter “instant forest”) is as listed below:
[S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S
On February 14, 197, August 21, 1917, the inheritance of Defendant KK on August 21, 2014, and on March 10, 2015, M& B 1/4 C 1/4 K 1/4 E 3/36 L 2/36 L 2/36 L 36 A 6/144, I, J 1/14 M 2/36 G 2/36 L 2/36.4
B. The status of the use of the forest of this case and the surrounding land (hereinafter referred to as “N” is the same as the forest of this case, since the surrounding land is the same as the forest of this case) is as follows:
[Attachment 1] The Plaintiffs’ partition proposal is the annexed Form 1, and the annexed Form 2 is the division proposal of the Defendants (excluding Defendant G), and the annexed Form 3 is the cadastral map of the forest of this case and its surrounding areas). The forest of this case is actually used as forests and fields in fact.
Attached Form
1 Between the section 2 and the section 3 of the drawings, the clan funerals of the Defendants (excluding Defendant G) are installed around 2013.
Attached Form
3 Drawings and P are owned by Plaintiff A, and Q land is used as a restaurant by Defendant G by installing a restaurant building.
The part of the forest land of this case abutting on roads is the next part of the forest land of this case with the indication of drawings in attached Form 1.
【Ground for Recognition: Each entry of Gap evidence Nos. 1 through 7 and the purport of the whole pleadings】
2. The parties to the division wish to divide as indicated in the separate drawing No. 1. The Defendants (excluding Defendant G) want to divide as indicated in the separate drawing No. 2. The Defendants (i) want to divide as owned by Defendant G, “(i)” as indicated in the separate drawing No. 2, and “I” as owned by Defendant G, “B” and “Idd” as owned by the Plaintiffs, and the remainder as owned by the Defendants (excluding
3. In light of the following facts acknowledged by each of the above evidence, the judgment is examined, and the plaintiffs' division proposal (attached Form 1) is as follows.