Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 3,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

1. At around 15:00 on October 2, 2014, the injured Defendant told the victim D (Namnam and 70 years of age) (the above apartment security guard), who had been under the influence of alcohol, about the passage issues prior to the entrance of the underground parking lot, which he had been able to think, but on the ground that the victim D was able to face without his own sex. However, the victim D was able to face with the head of the central ebbb, so that the victim was sculed and pushed down, which requires approximately 13-day medical treatment, and the victim was able to see the victim E (the age 68) who is another security guard who has been seated in the above guard room, and continued to go beyond the bridge of the victim E (the age 68) who is the victim E (the victim E) who had been sitting in the above guard room for about seven days.

2. On the ground that the victim G (the aged 32) who is a police officer belonging to the F District Unit of the Incheon Western Police Station, in receipt of a report, unilaterally disregards himself/herself in the process of hearing statements against the said D, etc., the Defendant insultd the victim by openly talking the victim with a large voice that “I must see. The age of shet shet shet. Where he/shes. Cym she will grow up. The police she will shet shet shet shes down.”

Summary of Evidence

1. Court statement of the defendant (the second trial date);

1. The police statement concerning G;

1. Each statement of D, E, and H;

1. CCTV closure photographs;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to a copy of a medical certificate of injury to D, and a letter of opinion to E;

1. Article 257(1) of the Criminal Act and Article 257(1) of the Criminal Act regarding criminal facts, Article 311 of the Criminal Act (influence of injury), and each Defendant selected a fine. The Defendant asserted that the Defendant did not constitute a crime of self-defense, inasmuch as the Defendant was smuggling to defend himself/herself against the victims at around 15:00 on October 2, 2014, since he/she only was sealed by the victims, the Defendant did not constitute a crime of self-defense. However, the background, means, method, and degree of damage recognized by the evidence duly adopted and investigated by the court, etc.