1. According to the expansion of the purport of the claim by this court, the judgment of the first instance is modified as follows.

The defendant.

Comprehensively taking account of the purport of the argument in Gap evidence No. 1, the plaintiff, on September 2, 2013, leased the house of this case to the defendant 2,00,000, 200,000 won per month, and 2,00,000 won per month from September 4, 2013 to July 4, 2014. The plaintiff agreed to pay the rent in advance. The above lease contract is implicitly renewed and it remains on the date of closing argument in the trial.

(1) The Plaintiff asserted that the Plaintiff agreed with the Defendant to pay KRW 400,00 per month from July 5, 2014 to KRW 400,00, but the evidence submitted by the Plaintiff alone is insufficient to acknowledge this, and there is no other evidence to acknowledge this otherwise, the Plaintiff’s above assertion is without merit). Meanwhile, the Plaintiff paid the Plaintiff the Plaintiff a sum of KRW 10,00,00 as the rent of the instant house, which is KRW 30,00 on September 4, 2013, KRW 30,00 on October 31, 2013, KRW 40,000 on December 14, 2013, KRW 200,000 on June 1, 2014, KRW 1,500,000 on November 1, 2014, KRW 150,000,000 on May 20, 2014.

Therefore, with respect to the Plaintiff, ① the remainder of 4,30,000 won in arrear from September 4, 2013 to July 4, 2017 (=9,20,000 won - 4,90,000 won) and the rent of KRW 2,30,000 among the rent in arrear (from August 8, 2016 to September 4, 2016; KRW 20,000 (from September 5, 2016 to KRW 10 to KRW 20,000; KRW 10,000 from September 5, 2016 to KRW 20; KRW 10,000 from October 5, 2016 to KRW 10 from June 2, 2016 to KRW 10,000 among the rent in arrear); and KRW 10,500 from October 16, 2016 to KRW 10.